<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expand truncated feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew. I think for a lot of the bigger sites, it&#039;s definitely a choice. The idea is that stats go up, and they might click ads, and maybe they think they&#039;ll be more inclined to leave a comment. But it&#039;s a false logic. I think most people using a feed reader probably just click NEXT most of the time, and they ultimately get less readers going to the site.

It&#039;s possible that it is the default setup for some people when they set up their blogs though. And I bet there&#039;s a few people with blogs who don&#039;t use readers that much and that don&#039;t even realize.

Something else that&#039;s always seemed quite pointless to me on websites is pagination.  There&#039;s a great plugin called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.ie/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=autopager &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; autopager &lt;/a&gt;that kills it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew. I think for a lot of the bigger sites, it&#8217;s definitely a choice. The idea is that stats go up, and they might click ads, and maybe they think they&#8217;ll be more inclined to leave a comment. But it&#8217;s a false logic. I think most people using a feed reader probably just click NEXT most of the time, and they ultimately get less readers going to the site.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible that it is the default setup for some people when they set up their blogs though. And I bet there&#8217;s a few people with blogs who don&#8217;t use readers that much and that don&#8217;t even realize.</p>
<p>Something else that&#8217;s always seemed quite pointless to me on websites is pagination.  There&#8217;s a great plugin called <a href="http://www.google.ie/search?sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=autopager " rel="nofollow"> autopager </a>that kills it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbraine.com/2010/04/expand-truncated-feeds.html#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Hey John, I somehow missed this post, thanks for putting it up. I hate those truncated feeds too, so i&#039;m delighted there&#039;s something can be done about them.
Do you know if having the feed that way is a choice the blogger in question has made? i&#039;ve often been tempted to leave a comment or send an email asking them to sort it out, but I don&#039;t want to do that if it&#039;s not their fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John, I somehow missed this post, thanks for putting it up. I hate those truncated feeds too, so i&#8217;m delighted there&#8217;s something can be done about them.<br />
Do you know if having the feed that way is a choice the blogger in question has made? i&#8217;ve often been tempted to leave a comment or send an email asking them to sort it out, but I don&#8217;t want to do that if it&#8217;s not their fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

